Android 4.0 ICS On My HTC Incredible

Rooting my Android phone was probably the best thing I've ever done to it, besides taking the little guy home with me, of course. I love the control it gives me over the software I decide to load onto my device, which has amazing impact. For starters, the operating systems available give me great battery life, and are a much lighter package than any OEM system with all of their "bloatware". And of course, I've been able to upgrade my phone to 2.3 Gingerbread before HTC released their update for it. To be honest, I'm still not sure if they've released their build for the Incredible yet.

Mostly, I've used CyanogenMod 7 throughout the life of my phone. I've dabbled in OMGB and MIUI and both are really good. Although I was dissapointed to hear that the Incredible will probably not be getting CyanogenMod 9, which is the new ICS version of CyanogenMod. I was pretty dissapointed at the notion that my device, a mere year and a half old, was too much of an antique to get any kind of support in the modding community. But then, I found AOPK. I'd heard of them, but they didn't have a build for the Incredible, until recently. I first attempted to install 39, and ran into issues with my display. Seemed like a kernel issue, considering that it seemed like it was having issues displaying info on my screen correctly. However, the RootzWiki thread on AOKP for the Incredible informed me that builds 38 and 39 aren't working for this device, and 37 is the most current working build.

So far, I'm quite impressed at how well ICS works on my Incredible. I was worried that since it really only meets minimum specs for ICS, that it'd be akin to running 1.6 Donut back in Android's prime. But honestly, while I do notice that it's not as snappy as it could be, I don't notice any significant lags or delays that would cause me to worry about using it as my daily driver. Which is exactly what I'm gonna do for the foreseeable future; enjoying Chrome Beta and other features and software that until now I was unable to use.

UPDATE: After a day or so running this as my primary driver, I decided to go back to CyanogenMod. The less than snappy response time does take a toll as the day goes on. The memory usage is almost always up near maximum and it caused a couple of crash reboots, a bit too frequently for my taste of a daily driver. I do have a clockworkmod backup of it in case I want to revisit it, but the recent update to CM 7.2.0 is super snappy and quick and just works better with my hardware as a daily driver.

Facebook Can't Get Out Of It's Own Way

It's so popular to hate on Facebook these days that if ever I bring up any kind of qualm I have about how Facebook works, I'm labeled as a hater. It's just how these kinds of things go I guess. I don't let it get to me anymore, but it used to perturb me quite a bit. So to anybody who's going to construe any kind of legitimate and logical complaint about Facebook as mindless hatred, leave now.

The root of all of my frustrations with Facebook is that it's spurred a massive gold-rush of personal data mining by creating an environment in which developers can try to get you to agree to give them access to your personal profile information by installing apps and dangling a carrot out in front of the common user. Prime example of this is whenever I want to read an article hosted by Yahoo! that a friend of mine has shared on Facebook. All I want to do is click the link and be taken to Yahoo!'s article and read the damn thing. But, alas, I must be stopped by Yahoo!'s Facebook app, as it is the portal through which I must get to the article. No I don't want to install your app. I just want to read the article, not give you access to all of my personal information. And so I deny the app's requests and carry on through my news feed disappointed that Facebook actually impeded the social sharing that it's supposed to facilitate. Completely the opposite of how it was supposed to happen. Somewhere along the line, after Facebook rose to social networking dominance, it began to take on all kinds of other projects and sew them onto it's existing frame, in a stupid mission to become the only destination anybody has on the Internet. Games and Apps saw that anybody who produced content for the Internet could produce that same content within Facebook. And now what we have is this Frankenstein of a once well polished social network that tries to be too many other things, and that mission has gotten in the way of the only thing people really want to use a social network for: Sharing information. That is it. The one thing any social network is useful for. And now Facebook is allowing the free reign it's given 3rd party developers to make apps, to get in the way of itself. Which, to me at least, is absolutely infuriating. I should not be stopped from viewing the content that I am tempted with in my news feed. That is completely anti-productive for Facebook to do.

And another problem that has been beginning to piss me off lately is the intrusion of advertisements into my Timeline. I was perfectly fine with ads off to the side of every page. But when they actually appear within the content that I'm searching for in my or someone else's Timeline, it makes for an awesomely effective distraction and it's that much more difficult to find what I'm looking for. Which, again, is the exact opposite of what Facebook is supposed to do. Connecting people who share information and making that information  easier to find is the prime directive, if you will, of a social network. So once again, you have Facebook getting in it's own way. And Facebook now being a publicly traded company, these kinds of things are just going to get worse now that there's investors to please.

Now, fortunately (or unfortunately, really), my friends still produce interesting enough content such that I haven't been willing to stop going to Facebook to see what they're up to, or what they're reading or sharing. But it's becoming more of a chore to check Facebook for me; becoming more of a headache every time I leave the site, because it's almost always because I can't stand being denied reading an interesting story for the sake of installing someone's app.

E3 2012: Ubisoft Press Conference Reaction

Ubisoft had the 3rd press conference of the day and blew Microsoft and EA out of the water. After this showcase, I'm not only excited for some stuff to come out, but I've also been convinced to go back and play some titles that I missed in the past.

I was worried at the outset, as they began with a showcase of Just Dance 4. It consisted of a live demo with hot chicks in skimpy outfits dancing with the game they were dancing to behind them and FloRida performing with a ridiculous microphone. I was not expecting much if this is what they were opening with.

But things got better with Far Cry 3, whose predecessors I've never played, but would if I had a decent PC. Looks like a solid and exciting game.

Then they moved to what I was itching to see more of, Splinter Cell: Blacklist. Disappointingly there wasn't much except a premiere trailer, which is different from the gameplay that Microsoft's conference showcased earlier today. At least the trailer was very bad ass. From what I gathered, Sam is now the head of "4th Echelon", and it looks like Anna Grimmsdottir is back too. It looks like it focuses on more of what Conviction began, with the fast paced takedowns and "think on your feet" pace. Thankfully it doesn't seem to do away with the emphasis on stealth. I was pretty disheartened when Sam spoke and I didn't hear Mike Ironside. It doesn't appear to be a younger Sam Fisher, but it does seem like the iconic voice I love so much. While it's a let down to be sure, it won't stop me from buying it. I'm really anxious to see what more comes out of E3 in the next couple days, because it's gonna be agonizing waiting a whole year to play it. It's slated for Spring of 2013.

Next up was some showcasing of a new Rayman title utilizing the Wii U, which actually looked really fun and then some junk about E sports and a cheesy demo of a game called Shootmania with some world champion Counter Strike players.

Then the big one...Assassin's Creed 3. Now while I've never played these games, I am most definitely going back and playing them because both the trailer and gameplay demo looked incredible. Being such a fan of Splinter Cell and Metal Gear Solid and Batman Arkham City/Asylum...just about any stealth based game, I'm not sure why I never picked them up, but that's gonna change.

The last presentation began very odd, with a trailer that seemed more like a lecture about how the world has become so connected and how personal information collection is being used against the average Joe. I was thinking, where are they going with this. And then a gameplay demo ensued for a game called Watch Dogs, which is by far the best game announced/demoed thus far, and I don't see it being dethroned either. Basic premise is that you are a kind of vigilante who uses the city's infrastructure to spy and cause mayhem to things to accomplish your objective. The pace seems varied and there seems to be a good mix of intelligently thinking about the situation, and violent action.

E3 2012: EA Press Conference Reaction

I wasn't looking for much from EA's press conference. Despite being the largest video game publisher in the world, I'm not a fan. Although, as it happens, they publish one of my favorite games, Battlefield 3. And with so much activity in the Battlefield world lately, I most definitely sat through them droning on about their sports franchises (including an entire 20 minutes on FIFA 13) so that I could hear from DICE.

The big Battlefield announcement was Battlefield Premium. For a one time fee of $50 (it's $49.99 but let's call it what it is) a player can gain access to, what I am rather surprised to be, an impressive host of content for the price. First and foremost, you get all 5 of the expansions. At the normal price of $15 apiece, that'd run you $75. So for just this, you're saving $25 versus doing it a la carte. On top of that, you get a number of exclusive in-game items like solider camouflages, gun camouflages, special dog tags, a unique melee knife, and unique assignments. Players also get the privilege to reset stats, get priority queuing into servers as well as exclusive double XP events.

Frankly, I think that's a ton of content for the price. When I first heard rumors about this premium service DICE was gonna slap onto Battlefield, I was worried they'd ruin it. Thank God they haven't. I've never been a fan of exclusives. But it looks like the industry is finally finding a way to do it right. It used to be that it gave people who had the dough a decided advantage in the game itself. Since I'm planning on buying all of these expansions anyways, I have an actual economic reason that's not silly for also getting all the extra gimmicky in-game goodies that I feel kinda silly for wanting to pay for anyways. Unfortunately for me, I already shelled out $15 for Back to Karkand, so I'm only saving $10 in the end, but that's still some money. Which means I'm gonna have to buy it before next week, when Close Quarters comes out or else I'm actually losing money on just the expansion pack values and actually paying some for the gimmicks. Which I suppose wouldn't be so bad, because while I hate to admit it, I have actually paid for things like Xbox Live avatar items before. (Hangs head in shame).

Although one very exciting, and quite surprising piece of news from the press conference, was the demo of Medal of Honor Warfighter. I'd heard about this a few weeks ago, but EA had a nice little live gameplay demo of some singleplayer action, followed by some edited video of some multiplayer. I was pleasantly surprised at how good the singleplayer action looked. It's nice to see the Frostbite 2 engine at work in another game than just Battlefield, and to see another developer using the engine than just DICE. Despite it being the same engine, the developer seems to have tweaked it well enough that it doesn't look to be just another Battlefield impersonator, which is what many criticized the first Medal of Honor (not really the "first" per se, as MoH goes back a very long way) as being. I personally never thought that, having owned and played both Battlefield Bad Co. 2 and Medal of Honor. The multiplayer seems to have introduced a rather compelling aspect, which is the choice of which country to fight for. EA seemed to suggest during their demo that since gamers exist all over the world, it'd be good to cater to those that aren't Americans. Let's face it, most modern military FPSs feature militaries from one of the world's major powers (U.S., Russia, UK is just about as big as the pool gets). Nearly every country with a respectable military has a branch that features Tier 1 SpecOps operators and letting someone from Canada or Germany or Australia play as their own flag is, I think, a very cool, yet brilliantly simple way, of enhancing the game and maybe even drawing in some gamers who would have previously passed this title over. How exactly your choice of homeland will effect the actual game play remains to be seen, as not much in way of this was revealed during the demo. I suppose we'll see. But all things considered, I enjoyed the first MoH and it's sequel looks to be even better. I might actually have to pass it up, unfortunately, because of the investment in Battlefield Premium I'm ultimately going to make.

The other big game at the showing was Crysis 3, and I've never played any of those and they don't really peak my interest much, as well as Madden and FIFA 13. Although I do enjoy EA Sports' titles (except for FIFA, I just can't get into soccer...yes soccer), I almost never have money to buy them. The show also saw other demos and announcements including a SimCity re-boot from Maxis (I didn't know they were still around), a Need For Speed: Most Wanted re-boot from the makers of Hot Pursuit, and an official partnership announcement between EA Sports and UFC.

Battlefield 3 Teamwork Frustrations

I played Battlefield 3 for several hours today, which is pretty common for a summer day off for me. Some ups, some downs. I played with some randoms who, surprisingly, all had mics on, and we ended up having a blast of a time together.

A common headache I always inevitably run into when playing this awesome game for any stretch of time is the lack of common teamwork. I don't mean the kind of "let's all put head sets on, and plan on how to attack the hill top on a sand table" kind of teamwork. I mean the really simple kind of stuff that involves pressing a single damn button. Like throwing down medkits and ammo boxes, or spotting enemies. Whenever I play as an Assault or Support class, I'm constantly throwing down ammo boxes and medkits everywhere. They recharge really fast (on the order of like 10 seconds). Most frustrating is when I really need it, and I call for it with the in-game request mechanic and don't get any help. The only explanations can be a simple lack of attention to the situation for the sake of need for kills and sprinting head first into the breach, or that people simply don't realize some of the mechanisms built into Battlefield 3. Honestly, I think it's mostly the latter.

This is why I was asked how good I was

I think that's the case because earlier today, when I teamed up with the randoms I spoke of, they were really impressed with how well I was doing and went so far as to ask me how I was "that good". I don't mean to seem vane, but I get that a lot. I guess I just "get" this game better than most. It just makes sense to me and I notice things and think about how to move and position myself to survive and be most effective in my role in the game. Furthermore, if one examines the Battle Report pictured at right, you'll see that I got 57 kills, and 13,000+ combat score. This means that 5,700 points of this score came from kills. That is less than half. It is true that one can accumulate a lot of points from suppression assists, kill assists, and headshot and multikill bonuses. But even taking that into account, That is still, at most, only half of my score. The other half came from reviving teammates (which earns points equal to that of a kill, and more than that if you revive a teammate), and healing teammates with medkits. Just think about that. DICE has structured this game to heavily reward teamwork, and they've weighted the teamwork aspect as an equal to the "shooting at bad guys" aspect.

So I think I've noticed these things in Battlefield 3, where others haven't. The thought came to me to try to hold Battlefield 3 clinics with Google+ hangouts or something. But I'd have to drum up interest first and that's something I just don't have. I've wanted to make some YouTube videos similar to the work of channels like Matimi0 or dontblink, but I neither have, nor can afford, video capture equipment. So I'll speak to the dark void that is the Internet in the hopes that someone hears these tips to improve their score and experience in Battlefield 3:

When playing with any class:

• The game has a contextual communication function. If playing on Xbox or Playstation, this is used by pressing the Back button, or Select button respectively. The following tips will refer to this.

How to deal with healing and first aid for both the injured and the healer:

• If you get injured, any teammate who has a medkit will now have a box with a medical plus sign over their head, and will appear on your minimap as this symbol as well, making it very easy to seek out a medic. Not all Assault class teammates will have medkits, because they can opt to trade the medkit for the M320 or M26, which tailors their loadout to killing enemy infantry. But the game is smart enough and will not make any teammate without a medkit appear as such. Furthermore, medkits that already exist on the ground will appear as a circle with an oblong diamond shape inside. This makes it easier to seek out aid, as you may not have to bother trying to get a response out of a friendly medic. If you want to request a medkit from a teammate with one, look at them, and press the communication button (Back or Select on consoles). In-game, your character will yell out "Hey I need first aid", and you will now appear on the minimap of the medics on your team as a blinking first aid symbol, which really helps in trying to get the attention of your team.
• If you're playing as a medic, and by that I mean you have opted for the medkit instead of the M320 or M26, it's important that you use it as much as possible, because it can really rack you up some serious points. You should be constantly throwing it down. It recharges every 10 seconds, so throw it as you come to objectives, common choke points, and when you spawn on a squad mate (healing a squad mate will earn your 30 points instead of 20). A heal of a teammate will earn you 20 points several times over, depending on how much healing your medkit does. It will heal multiple teammates, so throw it at groups. I always find myself throwing it down at pretty much every piece of cover I take in preparation for a firefight, because it works on yourself as well and can make the difference if you're exchanging volleys with enemies. If you hear someone's character in-game cry out for a medic or first aid, take the time to throw one. You don't even have to stop running toward your objective. Just throw it. If you glance at your minimap and see a flashing medic symbol, try to make your way to the injured teammate.
• Don't get too greedy for easy points, however, that you run out into crazy obvious danger to get them. You're gonna be no use to your team as a dead medic. The same goes for revives. DO NOT revive teammates if there are enemies right there. Kill them first, then worry about healing and reviving. Nothing is more frustrating than to get revived only to get gunned down immediately. It adds a lot of time to a teammate's spawn, and will only frustrate your team.

How to deal with ammo:

• The same principles from above apply. Ask for ammo from support class players if you're out or running low.
• The symbol for an ammo box on the minimap is a circle with three lines in it.
• Support class teammates will have a box with three cartridges (bullet plus casing) symbol above their heads if you're less than full on ammo. Likewise, if you're support class, teammates who need ammo will have this symbol over their heads and on the minimap. They will blink in the same way on the minimap if they call out for ammo.
• Ammo boxes will refill any kind of ammunition, including frag grenades, SMAW/RPG/Javelin/Stinger/SA-80 rockets, gadgets like radio beacons and SOFLAMs, anything!

I tried getting picture examples of the minimap symbols and such, but nothing exists on the Internet for this apparently, and as I mentioned before, I don't have recording equipment to capture it myself. I hope these tips help to understand the mysteries of Battlefield 3.

The CoDified Future of Battlefield

I'm a long time player and fan of both the Battlefield and Call of Duty franchises. Along with Halo, they are the cream of the crop when it comes to FPS games. I've been playing Battlefield since Battlefield 2, Call of Duty since the original Modern Warfare, and Halo since Halo 2. Without a doubt, however, I would rather play a Battlefield game than any other FPS, if I were given a single choice. Consequently, I am often labeled as a "hater". To that I say, "sure, whatever". Label me as you will. I love other shooters, but none have given me the amount of satisfaction as the intense and frenzied team play you find in a Battlefield game. But I worry about the future of DICE and it's precious Battlefield franchise.

For those who are unfamiliar with the current news out of the Battlefield camp, DICE has announced 3 major expansions for Battlefield 3: Close Quarters, Armored Kill, and End Game, two of which release this year. The first will be out this June, or at least we hope. June 12 is the official date announced by DICE and EA, but we'll see if that turns out to be true. With Close Quarters, we will see a departure from the large maps with jets, tanks, helicopters, and APCs that characterize a typical Battlefield map. Instead we've been promised smaller, mostly indoor, maps where infantry combat will be featured. The action will be intense, fast paced, and because the Frostbite 2 engine will not have to render such large scale maps, we've been promised that these maps will feature larger amounts of destruction and vertical gameplay.

For the last few weeks, I've been pretty pumped, anticipating the inclusion of new maps, weapons, and new tactics to get used to. We gamers love to spice things up with new ways to play a game. I envision the kind of enigmatic firefight that takes place in The Matrix between Neo, Trinity, and two dozen or so SWAT dressed baddies in the lobby of the high rise as the pair attempt to rescue Morpheus. Pillars shredding to nothing as bullets and grenades fly everywhere. When this releases, I'm gonna have some good ol' fun with it. No doubt.

But the last couple days, the thought has been irking me...this seems a bit more "CoDified", if I may invent a new word. Why the fuck not, the English language is already wonky as hell anyways. While the CoD vs Battlefield debate rages within the gaming community, it is undeniable that the masses of gamers out there now know about Battlefield. While in the past it was a game that the PC minority enjoyed, the huge step DICE and EA took to ensure a great Battlefield experience on the consoles has opened up the franchise to a much broader audience. Ergo, a whole lot of CoD and Halo players have begun to give Battlefield a try, whether or not they end up liking it. Let's face it, the large scale maps, vehicles, and immersive destruction and audio of Battlefield 3 and it's Frostbite 2 engine can be quite a shell shock for any gamer used to the pace and play of Call of Duty. Consequently, many don't like it.

And yet there's another group who will come to love it, yet don't adjust to the style of play Battlefield-ers are used to. They'll be engaged by the immersive qualities the gameplay and engine offer, but continue to play it as though it were only about the kills, and not about the team work and tactics that characterize a Battlefield game. And it is THIS group that I'm concerned about. This demographic will grow with the release of Close Quarters this July. The game style promoted by it is much more reminiscent of a Call of Duty title than a Battlefield title. Given that the masses are now aware of Battlefield's existence, there's going to be a ton of gamers giving Battlefield a try if they can play it like Call of Duty. And one of two things will happen if there is a sudden influx of CoD and Halo players. They'll adjust to Battlefield's pace and team oriented play, or they'll keep playing it like CoD and just dilute the game for the rest of us. I think the PC platform will be largely untouched by this problem, but for us console players, we're going to have to deal with a whole slew of the CoD crowd not being team players and just running around for kills. It's going to be frustrating, and I'm not sure if I'm so pumped for Close Quarters any more.

I could be full of hot air here, and believe me, I hope I am, but I draw from past experience in forming this opinion. Let's consider what happened to a little game known as Project Reality:

Project Reality is a mod by Black Sand Studio based on Battlefield 2. It's goal is to use the game to create as realistic an experience as possible. And let me tell you, they sure as hell succeed. It's so excellent at this, that it's come to be referred to as a "walking sim" by both those who love and hate it. While it's incredibly frustrating to play at first, because of the insanely slow pace, as you come to learn its ins-and-outs, you start to fall in love. Get in that first awesome squad, and in that first firefight, and you feel so immersed. You literally feel like you're an infantryman in Afghanistan fighting an insurgency as your squad leader barks orders and you and your squadmates as he coordinates with another squad to pincer attack an entrenched enemy. I understand that some people just don't like uber-realistic gameplay, and that's perfectly OK. I however, have been a massive military nerd since I can remember, and I was completely hooked. I spent night after night during my summers providing logistic transport, building firebases, crewing tanks, and Mumbling it up with a bunch of like-minded realism seekers. And as the time passed, and new versions came, and word began to spread more and more, the community started to grow. As more players came to try it out, I saw more and more dilution of the gameplay and a wearing away of the mentality of wanting to play it "right". The phrase "go back to vanilla" became used so much that it became a punch line. And keep in mind, Battlefield players have always been considered the "nerds" of the FPS community of gamers. This was nerds eroding the gameplay for uber-nerds. Unfortunately I've been away from the PR community for the last two years or so, so I can't speak to the condition of the game now, but I can attest to the dumbing down of the mod, and it was sad to see happen.

This may seem silly, but this is my hobby and I love Battlefield 3. I'm weary of what Close Quarters could end up being. I'm worried it's going to open up the game to those who don't care to play Battlefield the way a Battlefield game should be played. It's hard enough as it is, playing on my Xbox 360 and being frustrated that the moronic medic next to you won't throw his med pack down despite you calling for it in-game and with your mic as you sit at 4% heath because you just covered his back at the stair way and took a few rounds to the chest. I would venture to guess that only something like 20% of console Battlefield 3 players use the spotting mechanic, or even understand what it does or know it even exists. I so very much wish I could own a decent desktop computer and join the Battlefield 3 PC crowd that I very much believe will be mostly untouched by what I fear will be a swarm of CoD and Halo players diluting the Battlefield 3 experience. I guess we shall see.

The Kaleidoscope Program's Maiden Voyage

I've always wondered about blogging. I'm a massive tech nerd and have always wanted to try it out but never got around to it. Until now that is. I'm not really sure what kind of content I'm going to post here, but I can assure it'll probably be nerd-tastic! Which is kinda why I named the blog what I did. The title is taken from the song Brazenhead by the rock band Clutch, whom over the past two years have become my favorite band. The song describes the process in the brain which is used to identify things. Which, if you think about it, is a rather mysterious one. The process is described as though it were a program running on some kind of drone attempting to identify new things in other worlds. It is also the only song where the phrase "While maintaining geodesic stasis" is used. Neil Fallon has quite a way with words.

Anyways. I'll post things as they come to mind. We'll see where this goes.